USPTO serial 88621234
CROPCUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2020
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CROPCUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JARED N LELAND
JARED N LELAND HOUSTON HARBAUGH PC401 LIBERTY AVENUE, 22ND FLOORPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Packaging materials, namely, goods made from paper, cardboard, and plastic for packaging in the nature of bags, films, and sheets; none of the foregoing is intended to be used in connection with cannabis-related goods containing more than .3 percent THC on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS, CHRIS
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS, CHRIS
- Other trademarks owned by TROMBLEY, MATTHEW
- Other trademarks owned by TROMBLEY, MATTHEW
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CROPCUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |