USPTO serial 88622718
FOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRIS ANDERSON
Kris Anderson CLARK PARTINGTON4725 MAIN STREET, SUITE F-222ORANGE BEACH, AL 36561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | electric hydrofoil surfboards | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |