USPTO serial 88623353
RUBIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEINPFAD, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Boats and structural parts therefor; recreational vehicles, namely, personal watercraft, namely, single and multiple passenger recreational jet boats and structural parts therefor; Recreational vehicles, namely, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, three-wheeled vehicles, side-by-side vehicles and structural parts therefor; Recreational vehicles, namely, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, three-wheeled vehicles, side-by-side vehicles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |