USPTO serial 88625236
TRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenbush, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLEN E SCHUMANN
GLEN E SCHUMANN MOSS & BARNETT PA150 SOUTH FIFTH ST STE 1200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Zero turn riding lawn mowers | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |