Drawing for BANC

USPTO serial 88627674

BANC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindsay J. Hulley

LINDSAY J. HULLEY RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BOULEVARD14TH FLOORCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking services; on-line banking services; processing of debit card payments; processing of credit card payments; checking account services; savings account services; traveler's and cashier's check issuing services; money order services; safe deposit box services; financial administration of individual retirement accounts; financial services, namely, banking services, financial investment brokerage services and investment services, namely, funds investment services and advice related to investments; commercial lending services; mortgage lending services; lease-purchase financing services; equipment financing services; financial planning and investment advisory services, namely, wealth management, retirement planning, trust management account services, financial valuations, and providing information on financial investments; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; providing financial information by telephone and by online means in the field of financial investment account information and financial research; credit and financial consultation; financial advisory and consultancy services; financing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance