USPTO serial 88635211
ZIPSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts; Shirts; Polo shirts; Tank tops; three-quarter sleeve shirts; Long sleeve shirts; Embroidered shirts; Jackets; Hoodies; Sweatshirts; Sweatpants and joggers being sweatpants; Leggings; Shorts; Hats; Baseball Caps; Flip flops; Socks; Cloth bibs; Baby bodysuits; Swimwear; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Women's clothing, namely, short-sleeved t-shirts, long-sleeved T-shirts, sports bras, bodysuits, hooded pullovers, and hooded sweat shirts; all of the aforementioned goods, excluding a hooded shirt top and bottom that fold into a self-contained carrying case within the hood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |