USPTO serial 88635996
APTIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APTIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Ford
David J. Ford APTIV5725 INNOVATION DRIVETROY, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data; Telecommunication services for use in connection with automated driving systems, namely, electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Electronic transmission of motor vehicle diagnostic information; Electronic transmission of status information of motor vehicle systems; Wireless communication services, namely, telematic sending of information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by Aptiv Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named APTIV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |