USPTO serial 88637555
QUANTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garfield Goodrum
Garfield Goodrum GARFIELD GOODRUM, PLLC7 Allen St., Suite 302Hanover, NH 03755United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles, folding bicycles, mini-bicycles, electric bicycles, bicycle parts, saddlebags adapted for bicycles, none of the aforesaid being vehicles for disabled, handicapped and infirm persons, or being vehicles with more than two wheels; retail services for bicycles and bicycle parts, distribution of bicycles and bicycle parts; none of the aforesaid bicycles or bicycle parts being vehicles for disabled, handicapped and infirm persons, or being vehicles with more than two wheels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |