Drawing for REFRESH

USPTO serial 88638712

REFRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GABRIELLE S. ROTH

GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016flexible packaging materials made from synthetic polyolefin films, sold in sheets and rolls for use by food packaging facilities; semi-rigid plastic film for packaging, sold in sheets and rolls for use by food packaging facilitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2023MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 5, 2023ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 4, 2023EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 17, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 17, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 26, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 26, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 29, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 10, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 12, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 29, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Apr 28, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 13, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 27, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance