Drawing for SWAN EN BLANC RIESLING

USPTO serial 88639777

SWAN EN BLANC RIESLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6513793Status 700Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 12, 2021
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 700: Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six.

Need help with SWAN EN BLANC RIESLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $325

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve Polyakov, Esq.

Steve Polyakov, Esq. SIBILLA ALESSI PANTANO GUPTA LLC112 MADISON AVENUE, 6TH FLOOR112 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Spirits and liqueurs; Wine; Wine punch; Wine punches; Wine-based aperitifs; Wine-based beverage, namely, piquette; Wine-based drinks; Wines; Wines and fortified wines; Wines and liqueurs; Wines and sparkling wines; Acanthopanax wine (Ogapiju); Aperitif wines; Aperitifs with a wine base; Black raspberry wine (Bokbunjaju); Blended spirits; Brandy spirits; Cooking wine; Dessert wines; Distilled spirits; Fortified wines; Fruit wine; Grape wine; Honey wine; Kits for making wine; Mulled wine; Natural sparkling wines; Port wines; Potable spirits; Prepared wine cocktails; Red wine; Red wines; Rose wine; Rose wines; Shochu (spirits); Sparkling wines; Sparkling fruit wine; Sparkling grape wine; Sparkling red wines; Sparkling white wines; Still wine; Still wines; Strawberry wine; Sweet wines; Table wines; Tonic sweet grape wine containing extracts from ginseng and conchona bark (ninjin-kinatetsu wine); Whiskey spirits; White wine; White wines; Yellow rice wineACTIVESep 10, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2026REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2021R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 26, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2021PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2021PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
May 13, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 19, 2020TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance