USPTO serial 88640994
RYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN A. THOMPSON
Kevin A. Thompson LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Imitation leather; leather, unworked or semi-worked; sports bags; vanity cases, not fitted; leather straps; bags, namely, handbags; handbag frames; purse frames; umbrellas; walking sticks; handles for canes and walking sticks; clothing for pets; saddlery; industrial packaging containers of leather | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, namely, board games; magic tricks; toys for domestic pets; toys, namely, toy vehicles; dolls; dominoes; the game of go; Chinese chess games; dice; playing cards; cups for dice; draught games being checkers games; chess games; mah-jong; billiard equipment; play balls; body-training apparatus; archery implements; wax for skis; sports equipment, namely, baseball bags; machines for physical exercises; appliances for gymnastics, namely, balance beams; floats for bathing and swimming; fishing tackle; climbers' harness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |