USPTO serial 88640998
SPIDER WOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPIDER WOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN111 N MARKET ST, STE 300SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Decorative ornaments in the nature of natural sculptures of wood for use in terrariums, animal habitats, bird cages, floral arrangements, and interiorscape installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |