USPTO serial 88641567
ADIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Foster
Thomas D. Foster TDFOSTER - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW11622 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical or veterinary use; Gloves for medical purposes; Gloves for medical use; Medical gloves; Medical examination gloves; Nitrile gloves for medical use; Vinyl gloves for medical use; Protective gloves for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and cardboard goods, namely, paper toilet seat covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic containers for commercial use, namely, for storing and dispensing bulk foods; Plastic to-go containers for the fast food industry for made to order food products | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Facial tissue holders, Dispensers in the nature of boxes for facial tissues; Plastic drinking straws; Plastic cups, Paper cups; Paper plates; Drinking straws; Drinking straws of paper; Straws for drinking; Plastic household containers for foods; Disposable dinnerware in the nature of aluminum foil pans; portion cups, and pleated drink cups for the food service industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADIVA SUPERIOR CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIES,INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADIVA SUPERIOR CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIES,INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ADIVA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |