Drawing for LIBERTY · HERITAGE GRAND SLAM BEER EST.2019 BLONDE ALE 12 FL. OZ. 5.3% ALC. BY VOL. 53 IBU

USPTO serial 88644357

LIBERTY · HERITAGE GRAND SLAM BEER EST.2019 BLONDE ALE 12 FL. OZ. 5.3% ALC. BY VOL. 53 IBU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIBERTY · HERITAGE GRAND SLAM BEER EST.2019 BLONDE ALE 12 FL. OZ. 5.3% ALC. BY VOL. 53 IBU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pina M. Campagna

Pina M. Campagna Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP576 Broad Hollow RoadMelville, NY 11747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; Beer, ale, lager, stout and porterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 1, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance