USPTO serial 88650382
PENFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney LEE & HAYES, PC601 W. RIVERSIDE AVE SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Medical cost containment services to insurers and their members to realize overall cost reduction of healthcare expenditure through negotiated agreements with healthcare providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Assistance services to insurers whose members are travelling and require both medical and non-medical assistance in emergent and non-emergent situations, namely, insurance claims administration and insurance subrogation | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Assistance services to insurers whose members are traveling and require both medical and non-medical assistance in emergent and non-emergent situations, namely, coordinating medical care for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |