USPTO serial 88651397
TIVASALT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIVASALT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath salts, not for medical purposes; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Cosmetic bath salts; Mineral salt in the nature of bath salts not for medical purposes; Non- medicated bath salts; all of the foregoing goods containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel, Christopher Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel, Charles Howard III
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel, Christopher Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel, Charles Howard III
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named TIVASALT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2021 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |