USPTO serial 88653836
GRAND DADDY PURPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAND DADDY PURPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Robison
Frank Robison FRANK ROBISON LAW LLC2043 BUCHANAN PTLAFAYETTE, CO 80026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cannabis Sativa L and its derivatives and preparations namely terpenes being essential oil, essential oils, essential oils for flavoring, coloring, aroma for use in foods and beverages with none of the aforementioned comprised of cannabidiol (CBD); terpenes being essential oil, essential oils, essential oils for flavoring, coloring and aroma for use in cosmetics and cigarette liquids, perfumed oils, cosmetic body and skin oils, cosmetic oils, e-cigarette liquids comprised of essential oils none of which items in this Class include Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and no more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 004 | Industrial oils, greases, wax fuels, namely, candles, perfumed candles; waxes, namely, waxes being raw materials, plant based waxes for use in for use in the manufacture of other products; oils, namely, industrial oils, oils for lighting, and oils for use in the manufacture of other products; wicks for candles, all of the aforementioned using organic chemical compounds, plant extracts or plant material and none of which include Cannabis sativa L or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 029 | Cannabis sativa L and its derivatives and preparations, namely edible hemp oil, edible oils and fats, edible hemp seed oil, processed seeds for snacks, seed-based snack foods, with none of the aforementioned goods in this Class comprised of Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and none of which are comprised of more than trace amount of cannabidiol (CBD) | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |