USPTO serial 88660346
CHIZL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHIZL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Loves Park, IL
Loves Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George H. Kobayashi
George H. Kobayashi MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTD.203 N. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed nuts; dried fruit; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit and also including chocolate and/or yogurt; nut-based snack foods; nut-based spreads; nut butters; seed-based snack foods; seed butters; processed edible seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; nut-based snack bars; seed-based snack bars; nut- and dried fruit- based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | confections, namely, chocolate covered nut clusters, chocolate covered fruit clusters, yogurt covered nut clusters, yogurt covered fruit clusters, chocolate and yogurt covered nut clusters, chocolate and yogurt covered fruit clusters, chocolate covered nut and fruit clusters, yogurt covered nut and fruit clusters, chocolate covered caramels, yogurt covered caramels, chocolate covered coffee beans, namely, espresso beans, yogurt covered coffee beans, namely, espresso beans, chocolate covered pretzels, yogurt covered pretzels, chocolate covered cookies, yogurt covered cookies, chocolate covered rice-based snack foods, namely, rice sticks, yogurt covered rice-based snack foods, namely, rice sticks, chocolate covered corn-based snack foods, namely, corn sticks, yogurt covered corn-based snack foods, namely, corn sticks, chocolate covered sesame sticks, yogurt covered sesame sticks; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate covered dried fruit; yogurt covered nuts; yogurt covered dried fruit; snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers and pretzels; nut flours; snack foods made from nut flours, namely, crackers, flour-based chips, bread sticks, sesame sticks, puffed cheese balls, crisps in the nature of flour based chips, wafers; processed grains; grain-based snack foods; cookies; cookies with nuts; crackers; granola-based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | fresh nuts; raw nuts; unprocessed nuts; unprocessed edible seeds; unprocessed grains for eating | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TH Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TH Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CHIZL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |