USPTO serial 88663402
BIGDOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIGDOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burwood, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashly I. Boesche
Ashly I. Boesche PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; reinforcing metal building materials; ironmongery in the nature small items of metal hardware, namely, metal extension bars, universal joint; pipes and tubes of metal; goods of common metal, namely, metal sockets; metal hose fittings and connections; metal door furniture, namely, metal door handles, metal plugs, metal washers and tubs, metal plumbing materials, namely, metal sockets, universal joints, and metal extension bars for use in plumbing; metal tool boxes; metal closures for containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools and implements, namely, wrenches, sockets, socket sets, tool sets consisting of socket sets, screwdriver sets, and long arm key sets, tool sets consisting of hammer, handsaw, hacksaw, level, wrench, and long arm key set, tool sets consisting of retractable knife, hammer, and level, tool kits consist of hand-operated caulking gun, wrenches, retractable knife, and level, flares, tin snips, work brooms, back knife, levels, screwdrivers, hex key set, handsaw, rod cutter, hacksaws, retractable knife, trowel, board saw, plier, rod cutter blades, wire brush, hammers, knife blades, chisels, wrecking bars, hand-operated caulking gun, hand-operated rivet gun, head socket bits, mallets, combination squares | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal tool boxes; non-metal and non-paper closures for containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | parts and fittings for toolboxes, namely, plastic tool lids and plastic tray inserts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reece Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BIGDOG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |