Drawing for CLEARLY

USPTO serial 88664575

CLEARLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda G. Henry

Linda G. Henry FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring collaborative computer software platforms that enable users to collaborate in real-time, share computer screens and communicate in real-time; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for co-browsing of data; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for viewing, and sharing data; all excluding the traffic and transportation fieldsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Aug 20, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2021CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jan 12, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Dec 2, 2020ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 29, 2020EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 28, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance