Drawing for MAVEN

USPTO serial 88665393

MAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly S. Grimsley

Kimberly S. Grimsley OLIVER & GRIMSLEY, LLC1 OLYMPIC PLACESUITE 900TOWSON, MD 21204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for processing electronic payments to and from others that may be downloaded from a global computer network and/or recorded on computer media; Downloadable computer software used to process mobile payments; Downloadable computer software for use in contactless transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices used to process mobile payments; Downloadable computer software for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; Downloadable computer software for ensuring the security of mobile payments, of contactless transactions with retailers, merchants and vendors via mobile devices, and of credit and debit card information; Downloadable computer software for the storage, transmission, verification, and authentication of credit and debit card and other payment and transaction informationACTIVE—
036Providing a wide variety of banking services and payment services, namely, credit card payment processing services; Electronic funds transfer via electronic communications networks; Issuing credit cards and lines of credit, processing and transmission of bills and payments thereof, bill payment services with guaranteed payment delivery, all conducted via a global communications network; Bill payment services; Providing electronic mobile payment services for others; Providing, processing, verifying, and authenticating mobile payments, and contactless credit and debit card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devicesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers and computer networks; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for processing electronic payments to and from others; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for processing mobile payments; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in contactless transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices used to process mobile payments; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for ensuring the security of mobile payments, of contactless transactions with retailers, merchants and vendors via mobile devices, and of credit and debit card information; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for the storage, transmission, verification, and authentication of credit and debit card and other payment and transaction informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance