USPTO serial 88666326
AL RAKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2020
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AL RAKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dearborn Hts, MI
Dearborn Hts, MI
Dearborn Hts, MI
ANTAKYA/HATAY, TR
ALRAKY GIDA DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
HATAY, TR
Other trademarks owned by ALRAKY GIDA DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yue (Robert) Xu
Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Baba ghanoush; Beans, preserved; Bottled cut vegetables; Bottled sliced fruit; Canned cut fruit; Canned cut vegetables; Canned sliced fruit; Canned sliced vegetables; Canned vegetables; Dried fruit mixes; Dried vegetables; Edible oils and fats, preserves and pickles; Eggplant paste; Extra virgin olive oil for food; Falafel; Fruit jellies; Ghee; Hummus; Hummus chick pea paste; Jams; Jellies for food; Jellies, jams; Jellies, jams, compotes; Marmalade; Meat, fruit and vegetable jellies, jams, eggs; Mushrooms, preserved; Olive oil for food; Olive oils for food; Olives, preserved; Pickled cucumbers; Pickled vegetables; Pickles; Processed chickpeas; Processed olives; Tomato paste; Tomato purée; Vegetable soup preparations; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetables, canned | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jamal Eddin, Mohamad
- Other trademarks owned by Jamal Eddin, Mohamad
- Other trademarks owned by Jamal Eddin, Mohamad
- Other trademarks owned by ALRAKY GIDA
- Other trademarks owned by ALRAKY GIDA DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named AL RAKY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 12, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |