Drawing for PIZZA HUT CONNECT

USPTO serial 88669497

PIZZA HUT CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIZZA HUT CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathy Tang

7100 CORPORATE DRIVEPLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile application that enables sale, ordering, payment, tracking, and delivery of restaurant and takeout meals for customers; downloadable computer software, namely, computer programs used in managing restaurants; downloadable computer software for use operating and managing call centers use in the field of call center operationsACTIVE—
035Online and in-store ordering services in the field of restaurant takeout and delivery for customersACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for ordering, paying for, dispatching, routing, and tracking food delivery for customers; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of call center management for operating and managing call centersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance