USPTO serial 88670921
BREACHFEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSENTHAL, AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREACHFEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Staci R. DeReganucourt
Staci R. DeReganucourt QUINN IP LAW21500 HAGGERTY ROADSUITE 300NORTHVILLE, MI 48167Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the real-time reporting of a data breach and providing analysis of the risk associated with the respective data breach; downloadable computer software for the assessment and mitigation of risk and harm resulting from a data breach; downloadable computer software for assessing risk of identity theft and potential harm resulting from a data breach; downloadable computer software for compiling indicators of risk related to a data breach; downloadable computer software for assigning a risk score and identifying and ranking mitigation actions relative to a data breach | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of data breaches, namely, providing a real-time reporting of data breaches and analysis of the risk as a result of the particular breach; Consulting services in the field of risk and harm assessment as a result of a data breach; consulting services in the field of risk and harm mitigation as a result of a data breach; consulting services, namely, assessing a consumer's risk of identity theft or potential harm as a result of a data breach; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access, identity fraud, or data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for the real-time reporting of a data breach and providing analysis of the risk associated with the respective data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for the assessment and mitigation of risk and harm resulting from a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for assessing risk of identity theft and potential harm resulting from a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for compiling indicators of risk related to a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for assigning a risk score and identifying and ranking mitigation actions relative to a data breach | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Breach Clarity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Breach Clarity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SONTIQ, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BREACHFEED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |