USPTO serial 88670940
BREACH INTELLIGENCE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREACH INTELLIGENCE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Staci R. DeReganucourt
Staci R. DeReganucourt QUINN IP LAW21500 HAGGERTY ROAD, SUITE 300NORTHVILLE, MI 48167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the assessment and mitigation of risk and harm resulting from a data breach; downloadable computer software for assessing risk of identity theft and potential harm resulting from a data breach; downloadable computer software for compiling indicators of risk related to a data breach; downloadable computer software for assigning a risk score and identifying and ranking mitigation actions relative to a data breach; downloadable computer software designed to perform fraud analysis in response to a data breach; downloadable computer software for computing risk-related outputs as a result of a data breach; downloadable computer software for generating aggregated consumer breach histories; downloadable computer software for analyzing, accumulating, and reporting data breach events | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of risk and harm assessment as a result of a data breach; consulting services in the field of risk and harm mitigation as a result of a data breach; consulting services, namely, assessing a consumer's risk of identity theft or potential harm as a result of a data breach; consulting services in the field of fraud analysis in response to a data breach; consulting services in the field of analyzing, accumulating, and reporting data breach events; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access, identity fraud, or data breach; consulting services in the field of consumer fraud-risk profiles, predicting potential new account fraud as a result of a data breach, and predicting potential existing consumer account compromise or fraud as a result of a data breach; consulting services in the field of verifying customer identities in formal documents; consulting services in the field of authentication of consumer identities in formal documents;providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for the assessment and mitigation of risk and harm resulting from a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for assessing risk of identity theft and potential harm resulting from a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for compiling indicators of risk related to a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for assigning a risk score and identifying and ranking mitigation actions relative to a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform designed to perform fraud analysis in response to a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for computing risk-related outputs as a result of a data breach; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for generating aggregated consumer breach histories; providing temporary use of an online, non-downloadable, computer software platform for analyzing, accumulating, and reporting data breach events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Breach Clarity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Breach Clarity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SONTIQ, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BREACH INTELLIGENCE NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |