USPTO serial 88673708
THE SOUL OF CBD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAN DEN ABEELEN, DEREK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SOUL OF CBD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Johnson
James David Johnson JOHNSON & MARTIN, P.A.500 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROADSUITE 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Plant extracts for pharmaceutical purposes; vitamins; dietary supplements; all of the foregoing containing CBD solely derived from hemp containing no more than 0.3% THC on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |