USPTO serial 88673756
FOCUSME TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOCUSME TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison Brehm
111 River Street, John Wiley & Sons, Inc111 River StreetHoboken, NJ 07030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable digital test preparation and test-score maximization software that analyzes and adapts practice test questions to enhance proficiency, accuracy, test scores, and performance related to diagnostic quizzes and simulated practice exams; downloadable computer software platform for digital self-study featuring suggested additional study aid resources; downloadable self-study software in the nature of a digital online exam planner that utilizes users' historical data to create a personalized exam plan and schedule for users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online non downloadable digital test preparation and test-score maximization software that analyzes and adapts practice test questions to enhance proficiency, accuracy, test scores, and performance related to diagnostic quizzes and simulated practice exams; online non downloadable computer software platform for digital self-study featuring suggested additional study aid resources; online non downloadable self-study software in the nature of a digital online exam planner that utilizes users' historical data to create a personalized exam plan and schedule for users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOCUSME TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |