USPTO serial 88674748
THE COMPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2020
- Examiner
- TARASCIO, MAUREEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE COMPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. GERBEN LAW FIRM, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE. NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Virtual reality arcade services; Amusement arcade services; Providing amusement center services, namely, centers featuring amusement arcades, interactive play areas, and facilities for games and party centers for the purpose of entertaining people and celebrating events; Providing indoor amusement activities, namely, providing indoor amusement parks featuring virtual reality games, augmented reality games, amusement games, rock climbing and rope courses, trampolines, laser tag and similar experiential activities | ACTIVE | Jun 26, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |