Drawing for GENESIS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES THAT TRANSFORM

USPTO serial 88675024

GENESIS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES THAT TRANSFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENESIS SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES THAT TRANSFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele M. Glessner

Michele M. Glessner ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Freshwater output systems, comprised of Atmospheric water generators for generating consumable water in the nature of atmospheric water harvesting by converting air molecules into water, for water purifying, and for filteringACTIVE—
037Constructing, installing, and repairing apparatuses for generating consumable water in the nature of atmospheric water harvesting by converting air molecules into water, for water purifying and for filteringACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services for the research and design of apparatuses for generating consumable water in the nature of atmospheric water harvesting by converting air molecules into water, for water purifying and for filtering; consulting, design and development of solar technologies and water management systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 13, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 28, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance