USPTO serial 88675091
AEROGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner Esq.
Mark Lerner Esq. DUANE MORRIS LLP230 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles containing insect repellent | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Rodenticides; miticides; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides; herbicides; preparations for killing weeds and vermin; mosquito repellent coils; insect repellent in candle form | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Electric diffuser for insect repellents; Electric devices for attracting and killing insects; electrical devices for driving away insects; electric traps for insects; electric insect repelling diffusers, namely, devices that drive away insects via dispersal of an insecticide vapor; electric mosquito repellent coils; replacement parts and fitting for all aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AEROGARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |