USPTO serial 88675753
TEKNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DERBY, KAREN SHEREE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEKNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherbrooke, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Kunin
Peter Kunin DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Engineered spherical tungsten carbide, tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, silicon, titanium, aluminum, nickel alloys and silica powders for use in industry and science; nano metallic powders and plasma powder spherodization for use in research and development, industry and science; Ceramic powders used in research and development, in manufacturing, in industry and science; plasma treated ceramic powders for use in research and development, in manufacturing, in industry and science; ceramic nano powders for use in research and development, in manufacturing, in industry and science | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metallic engineered spherical powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science; plasma treated metallic powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science; metallic nanopowders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of atomization systems, electronic induction systems and electromagnetic systems for manufacturing engineered spherical tungsten carbide, tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, silicon, titanium, aluminum, nickel alloys and silica powders for use in industry and science, metallic and ceramic engineered spherical powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science, plasma treated metallic and ceramic powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science, metallic and ceramic nanopowders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science and for manufacturing engineered nano metallic powders and plasma powder spherodization and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research and development in the fields of engineered spherical tungsten carbide, tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, silicon, titanium, aluminum, nickel alloys and silica powders for use in industry and science, nano metallic powders and plasma powder spherodization, metallic and ceramic engineered spherical powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science, plasma treated metallic and ceramic powders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science, metallic and ceramic nanopowders for use in manufacturing, in industry and science | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |