Drawing for LEGION OF THE SYSTEM AFFECTED

USPTO serial 88676356

LEGION OF THE SYSTEM AFFECTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOSKOWITZ, SAMANTHA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGION OF THE SYSTEM AFFECTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin S. Costanza

Kevin S. Costanza SEED IP LAW GROUP LLP701 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, organizing and developing programs that aim to improve the lives of formerly incarcerated people, their families, and those at risk for incarceration; human resources consultancy services; business consulting services in the field of business strategy development for non-profit organizations; promoting the interests of formerly incarcerated people by means of public advocacy; employment recruiting and staffing services, namely, helping others to hire and train former felons entering the workforce; promoting the interests of former felons seeking to enter or reenter the workforce by means of public advocacy; promoting awareness of the benefits of hiring former felonsACTIVE—
036Charitable services, namely, providing financial support to disadvantaged individuals in the United States for the purpose of facilitating health, wellness and economic developmentACTIVE—
043Charitable services, namely, providing safe and affordable temporary housing to those in needACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 1, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance