Drawing for XYLECON

USPTO serial 88676449

XYLECON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XYLECON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Texturized cellulosic or lignocellulosic fibers used alone or combined with a solid or liquid carrier for use in the manufacture of pollution control products; texturized cellulosic and lignocellulosic fibers used alone or combined with a solid or liquid carrier for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations and dietary supplements; texturized cellulosic or lignocellulosic fibers used alone or combined with a solid or liquid carrier for use as agricultural products; texturized cellulosic or lignocellulosic fibers used alone or combined with a solid or liquid carrier for use in the manufacture of fuelsACTIVE—
017Composites of polymeric resin and fibers, namely, cellulosic fibers and/or lignocellulosic fibers, for use as a plastic substituteACTIVE—
019Composites of polymeric resin and fibers, namely, cellulosic fibers and/or lignocellulosic fibers, for use as a wood substituteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance