USPTO serial 88676908
LAW ZEBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAW ZEBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CARROLLTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Johanson
JUSTIN JOHANSON GRIFFITHS & SEATON PLLC3813 E KENWOOD STMESA, AZ 85215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal services, namely, providing customized documentation, information, counseling, advice and consultation services in all areas of intellectual property law, consumer protection law, tort law, personal injury, immigration law, family law, estate planning, civil or criminal procedure, property law, real estate law, and/or criminal law; Legal services, namely, providing customized documentation, information, counseling, advice and consultation services in all areas of consumer protection law; Legal advice; Legal consultancy; Legal consultation services; Legal information services; Legal services; Legal services, namely, providing customized legal information, counseling, advice, and litigation services in all areas of law to people and families of modest incomes; Providing legal services in the field of consumer protection law; Providing legal services in the field of intellectual property law, consumer protection law, tort law, personal injury, immigration law, family law, estate planning, civil or criminal procedure, property law, real estate law, and/or criminal law; Providing customized legal information, counseling, and advice, and litigation services in the field of consumer protection law; Providing customized legal information, counseling, and advice, and litigation services in the field of intellectual property law, consumer protection law, tort law, personal injury, immigration law, family law, estate planning, civil or criminal procedure, property law, real estate law, and/or criminal law; Providing an on-line interactive database featuring legal information; Providing information about legal services via a website | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |