USPTO serial 88677570
PIARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALBO, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Collingwood, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia W. Stangle
Claudia W. Stangle LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software platform and software application for mobile devices and for connecting, operating, controlling and managing internet of things (IoT) devices; downloadable computer software platform and software application for mobile devices for digital signal processing and management of internet of things (IoT) networks; downloadable computer software platform and software application for mobile devices and for supporting the collection, storing, utilization and analysis of information and data that are derived from internet of things (IoT) devices; internet of things (IoT) hardware and devices, namely, electric, temperature and light sensors, power and electric switches, gateway routers in the nature of computer hardware and microcontrollers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software platforms, software applications and hardware for mobile devices and for use with the internet of things (IoT); programming of software for others for mobile devices and for accessing and using internet of things (IoT) hardware and devices; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for mobile devices and for connecting, operating, and managing internet of things (IoT) hardware and devices; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and hardware problems and consulting services in relation to software platforms, software applications and hardware for mobile devices and for use with the internet of things (IoT); platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for mobile devices and for connecting, operating, controlling and managing internet of things (IoT) devices and providing temporary use of a web-based software application for connecting, operating, controlling and managing internet of things (IoT) devices; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for mobile devices and for digital signal processing and management of internet of things (IoT) networks and providing temporary use of a web-based software application for digital signal processing and management of internet of things (IoT) networks; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for mobile devices and for supporting the collection, storing, utilization and analysis of information and data that are derived from internet of things (IoT) devices and providing temporary use of a web-based software application for supporting the collection, storing, utilization and analysis of information and data that are derived from internet of things (IoT) devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |