USPTO serial 88678721
GENIUS DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENIUS DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E ROOK
DAVID E ROOK HOFFMAN WARNICK LLC540 BROADWAY 4TH FLALBANY, NY 12207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software application and a downloadable software platform for mobile devices for doctors to evaluate and manage health records, namely, for transmission of electronic health records, managing electronic health records and managing patient health and medical information, and for medical practice management for doctors in the nature of scheduling healthcare appointments, documenting healthcare related appointments forms, managing work schedules, viewing daily appointment schedules, and for doctors to communicate with each other | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing an online non-downloadable internet-based software application for doctors to evaluate and manage health records, namely, for transmission of electronic health records, managing electronic health records and managing patient health and medical information, and for medical practice management for doctors in the nature of scheduling healthcare appointments, documenting healthcare related appointments forms, managing work schedules, viewing daily appointment schedule, and for doctors to communicate with each other; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring a computer software platform for doctors to evaluate and manage health records, namely, for transmission of electronic health records, managing electronic health records and patient health and medical information, and for medical practice management for doctors in the nature of scheduling healthcare appointments, documenting healthcare related appointments forms, managing work schedules, viewing daily appointment schedules, and for doctors to communicate with each other | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 29, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 29, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |