USPTO serial 88679046
G REVOLUGROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G REVOLUGROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schnider
David Schnider NOLAN HEIMANN LLP16000 Ventura Blvd., Ste 1200ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for processing and administering mobile payments; downloadable computer software for processing contactless payment transactions with retailers, merchants and vendors via handheld computers, mobile phones and tablets; downloadable computer software for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information, payment transaction and payment information; downloadable computer software for ensuring the security of mobile payments, and of contactless payment transactions with retailers, merchants and vendors via mobile devices, namely, handheld computers, mobile phones and tablets; downloadable computer software for the storage, transmission, verification, and authentication of credit and debit card and other payment and transaction information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payment processing services involving mobile payments and contactless payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices and subsequent transmission of payment data; payment verification services involving mobile payments and contactless payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices; providing electronic access to an electronic exchange of credit and debit card information across a nationwide financial information network; processing of mobile payments and contactless payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices; providing a website featuring financial information for permitting account holders to review and revise their accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REVOLUGROUP CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REVOLUGROUP CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named G REVOLUGROUP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |