USPTO serial 88679354
PERFORMANCE STEERING COMPONENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE STEERING COMPONENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. SCHWARTZ
RICHARD L. SCHWARTZ WHITAKER CHALK SWINDLE & SCHWARTZ PLLC301 COMMERCE ST., SUITE 3500FORT WORTH, TX 76102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vehicular steering components, namely, power steering pumps for land vehicles | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
| 011 | Vehicular steering components, namely, vehicle steering system fluid cooling parts for land vehicles, namely, heat exchangers, hoses for vehicle steering system fluid coolers, and reservoirs | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
| 012 | Vehicular steering components, namely, steering kits comprised of power steering gearboxes, pumps, reservoirs, hoses for steering components and fittings for land vehicles; hydraulic cylinder assist gears for land vehicles; hydraulic steering components for land vehicles; tie rod components being structural parts of steering systems, namely, tie rod ends, tube adapters and jam nuts for land vehicles; seals for steering components for land vehicles; steering wheels and columns for land vehicles; power steering pulleys for land vehicles; steering universal joints and shafts for land vehicles, in International Class 12; date of first use and first use in commerce, at least as early as 2/1/2003 | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |