USPTO serial 88679420
SUPPLY. RECOVERY. PROOF.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPPLY. RECOVERY. PROOF.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt SAND, SEBOLT & WERNOW CO., LPA4940 MUNSON STREET, NWAEGIS TOWER, SUITE 1100CANTON, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING A SUITE OF CLOUD-BASED SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE (SAAS) SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE GLOBAL RECYCLING INDUSTRY VIA ANY INTERNET-CONNECTED DEVICE, TO TRACK, MANAGE AND REPORT ON HANDLING AND PROCESSING OF RECYCLABLES TO ENSURE TRANSPARENCY, REGULATORY COMPLIANCE, AND USER PRODUCTIVITY, AND TO PROVIDE REPORTING OF SAME | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |