USPTO serial 88679998
AMMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen,Guangdong, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hao Ni
HAO NI NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC8140 WALNUT HILL LANE SUITE 500DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatic oils; Cosmetic pencils; Cotton balls for cosmetic purposes; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Essential oils; Essential oils for aromatherapy use; Essential oils for personal use; Eyebrow pencils; Eyeliner pencils; Eyes pencils; False eyelashes; Foot smoothing stones; Impregnated cleaning pads impregnated with cosmetics; Lip liner; Make-up pencils; Nail polish pens; Nail polish remover pens; Natural essential oils; Pumice stones for personal use | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |