Drawing for AL ART + LOGIC

USPTO serial 88683003

AL ART + LOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARRIOLA, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AL ART + LOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darren M. Geliebter

Darren M. Geliebter LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP230 Park Avenue, 4th Floor WestNew York, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Carrying cases specially adapted for electronic equipment, namely, tablet computers and smart phones; Cases for mobile phones; Cell phone cases; Protective covers and cases for cell phones, laptops and portable media players; Protective covers and cases for tablet computersACTIVE—
018Backpacks; Business card holders in the nature of card cases and wallets; Credit card holders; Credit card cases and holders; Purses; Tote bags; Wallets including card holders; Wallets and wallet inserts; Wallets with card compartments; Wheeled tote bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance