USPTO serial 88683184
WALL-LA-LA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALL-LA-LA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harrisburg, PA
Harrisburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy THE LICHY LAW FIRM, P.C.222 EAST 68TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Construction materials in the nature of non-metal composite panels formed from recycled fiber-containing composites; Construction material, namely, non-metal composite panels formed from fiber-containing composites; Construction material in the nature of non-metal composite panels composed primarily of fiber composites; Construction materials, namely, composite panels comprised primarily of nonmetal materials; Non-metal construction materials, namely, fiberglass, exterior, water-resistant, and fire-resistant composite panels composed primarily of polystyrene, wood, concrete, stone; Building materials, namely, moldable fiberglass panels and fiberglass faced sheathing comprised primarily of fiberglass composites; Non-metal building materials comprised primarily of fiberglass composites and used as a substitute for plywood, gypsum and concrete, namely, wall panels, drilled and grouted pile foundations, sight barriers, planks, railway ties, jersey barriers, traffic routing apparatus being guardrails, utility poles, floor tiles, driveway tiles, and parking mooring bollards, parking stops and parking barriers being barricades, patio decking; and kits for producing the aforementioned building materials, namely, fiberglass panels comprised primarily of moldable fiberglass composites and non-metal casting forms; Fiberglass composite masterbatch; fiberglass composite masterbatch pellets; Roofing tiles, not of metal; non-metal roofing tiles formed from fiber composites; Semi-worked woods, namely, beams, planks and composite panels; Non-metal building materials, namely, recycled hardwood boards, logs, recycled beams, wood rafters, joists, planks, studs being wooden boards, and wood slabs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |