USPTO serial 88684243
ADAWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADAWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Hyman
Jonathan Hyman KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software recorded on cd-rom for use in scanning computer hard drives, memory, and operating system registries to detect and remove unwanted programs; downloadable computer software for use in scanning computer hard drives, memory, and operating system registries to detect and remove unwanted programs; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of brochures and manuals in the field of computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |