Drawing for CALIFORNIA RUSH

USPTO serial 88689382

CALIFORNIA RUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIFORNIA RUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik M. Pelton (Of Counsel)

Erik M. Pelton (Of Counsel) Vicente Sederberg, LLP455 Sherman Street, Suite 390Denver, CO 80203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032non-alcoholic beverages, namely, sports drinks, carbonated drinks, soft drinks, fruit juice, fruit drinks, drinks containing fruit extracts, drinks flavored with tea; lemonadeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 12, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2020LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 24, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2020LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Nov 19, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance