USPTO serial 88691025
TIROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NODES, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. David Galin
M. David Galin TUCKER ELLIS LLP950 MAIN AVENUE, SUITE 1100CLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electro-chemical discharge machine tools for metalworking; Metalworking machine tools; Machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; Laser engraving machines for woodworking; Machine tools, namely, clamps for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely, vices for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely, jaws for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; cutting machines; Machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; Industrial machinery, namely, electromechanical marking machines; Numerically controlled machines and machine tools used for machining parts; Lathes; Laser engraving machines; industrial robots; Computerized engraving machines; Engraving machines; Manipulators for forging presses and for forging machines; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, drilling tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, boring tools; Metal working machines, namely, saws and cutters; Electric chaff-cutters; Electric plasma cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric navigational instruments; Sonars; Radar apparatus; Satellite transmitters and receivers; Transmitters of electronic signals; Global positioning system (GPS); Satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system (GPS); Wireless transmitters and receivers; Sonar equipment and parts thereof; aerials; Global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; Wireless broadband radios; GPS tracking devices; Radios; Telepresence robots; Laboratory robots; Teaching robots; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Tactical robots; Security surveillance robots; Navigational instruments for vehicles; Mobile radios; Surveying machines and instruments; Electronic computers; Electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TINAVI Medical Technologies Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TINAVI Medical Technologies Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TIROBOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |