USPTO serial 88691556
RIVER SUPPLY CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIVER SUPPLY CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THOUSAND OAKS, CA
THOUSAND OAKS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COREY A. DONALDSON
COREY A. DONALDSON FERGUSON CASE ORR PATERSON LLP1050 SOUTH KIMBALL ROADVENTURA, CA 93004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin for industrial purposes, polyethylene glycol for industrial purposes, and combinations of the aforesaid goods; cannabidiol, cannabidiol isolate, highly concentrated cannabidiol, hemp extract, hemp extract cannabidiol, cannabidiol oil, cannabidiol powder, all being chemicals for use in the manufacture of electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) and non-medicated balms, creams, lotions, cosmetics, cosmetic products, and cosmetic preparations, all CBD-containing items including only CBD solely derived from hemp; none of the foregoing derived from cannabis or extracts or derivatives thereof with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Edible oils, namely, MCT oil containing no more than trace amounts of CBD; none of the foregoing goods containing cannabis or extracts or derivatives thereof with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NICOTINE RIVER, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NICOTINE RIVER, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named RIVER SUPPLY CO.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |