USPTO serial 88691885
HAPPY GUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPPY GUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castlegar, B.C., CA
Castlegar, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT CROTEAU
ROBERT CROTEAU ATTORNEY AT LAW205 E ANAPAMU STSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kefir making kits comprised of mason jars with attachable breathing lid components | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 2018 |
| 029 | Organic kefir, namely, kefir and water kefir grains; fermentation starter kits comprised primarily of milk ferments and kefir grains for culinary purposes for making water kefir and sauerkraut | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 2018 |
| 035 | Online retail store services and wholesale store services featuring fermentation starter kits, bottles, water kefir grains and cultures and kefir beverages, infused fruit, herbal and spice flavorings for use in beverages | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 2018 |
| 043 | Information services, namely, providing a website featuring information about recipes for water kefir, fermentation, and guidelines on ingredients; the forgoing does not include nutritional guidance or provide information about nutrition | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Happy Gut Pro
- Other trademarks owned by Happy Gut Pro
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named HAPPY GUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |