USPTO serial 88694308
MOLD-IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOLD-IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyriacos Tsircou
Kyriacos Tsircou TSIRCOU LAW, P.C.515 S FLOWER ST, 18TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Modeling compounds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |