Drawing for MIPI

USPTO serial 88694931

MIPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vigdis Bronder

Vigdis Bronder BIDDLE LAW PC650 NE HOLLADAY ST., SUITE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97232UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable electronic publicationsACTIVE—
035marketing overview of applicant's association servicesACTIVE—
042description of a technical development services event hosted by applicantACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 12, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 11, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance