Drawing for NEU CBD

USPTO serial 88696176

NEU CBD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHUBERT, HEATHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEU CBD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zachary L. Stavedahl

288 ROBBINS DRTROY, MI 48083UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin creamACTIVE—
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE—
029Fruit-based meal replacement bars for boosting energy; Nut-based snack foods; Seed-based snack foods; Shakes; Vegetable-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Chocolate candies; Coffee and tea; Gummy candiesACTIVE—
031Dried plants; Edible chews for animals; Natural plants and flowersACTIVE—
034Tobacco substitutesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2020LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 27, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2020LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance